Google Pixel 6’s price has rocked – and it’s undermining the iPhone 13

The Google Pixel 6 might be the most exciting Pixel yet. And it looks like it might cost less than the iPhone 13.

According to YouTuber Brandon Lee of This is technology today, Going through Android Central, its source claims that the Google Pixel 6 will cost € 649 in Europe. The larger Google Pixel 6 Pro is said to be priced at $ 899.

If this is true, the Pixel 6 would only see a $ 50 markup over last year’s Pixel 5. Since the Pixel 6 will feature Google’s new, game-changing custom Tensor chip, this could very well be a great alternative to the iPhone 13 Pro Max.

For comparison, the standard iPhone 13 starts at £ 779 for the 128GB model and the iPhone 13 Pro Max starts at £ 1,049. So the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro could be lower than the new iPhones by £ 130 and £ 150, respectively.

Brandon’s source is someone who works for a “big massive cell chain” in Europe. The source shared images from major inventory systems showing the names oriole and raven, which are the code names for Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, respectively. In it, the screenshot showed the assumed prices in Europe.

It should be noted that Lee uses a single anonymous source, which is not always the most reliable way to report. Ideally, a more reliable report would need more than one source or a single source willing to be recorded. We assume that this source requested to remain anonymous for fear of losing his job. So it’s possible that the only screenshot of the backend inventory systems Lee received was fake. Until there is more corroborating of this price information, we suggest not to believe it at face value.

Anyway, according to the source of Lee, as well as Jon Prosser of Home page technology, the ad is supposed to be scheduled for October 19 with a launch on October 28.

It appears Lee has good internal supplies within Google’s supply chain regarding the Pixel 6. Earlier this month, Lee received a video of the Pixel 6 Pro test unit. In the video below, you can see the color of the carbon, which looks like a light gray. The color of the fog will be assumed to have a lighter green tint.

Of course, a lot of the talk about colors and design is no longer speculation. This is because Google has already sent the Pixel 6 website live, where it is possible to see high quality images of the phone in its different colors. Not only that, the Google store in New York has a display Pixel 6 available for display, behind a glass box. Why fight the leakers when you can join them?

In terms of specs, the Pixel 6 is said to have minor downgrades compared to the 6 Pro, which would explain its more affordable price. Rumors and current reports suggest that the Pixel 6 will have a 2340×1080 AMOLED flat panel display at 90Hz. The Pixel 6 Pro is said to have a 6.67-inch curved AMOLED E5 display with a resolution of 3120×1440 and a refresh rate of 120Hz. The Pro display will also be LTPO, meaning it can instantly change its refresh rate up to 10Hz to save battery power.

Internally, the Pixel 6 would have 8 GB of RAM compared to 12 GB for the Pro. Both phones will apparently have a Samsung GN1 50MP camera and a 12MP ultra-wide lens. The Pro will also include a 48MP telephoto lens, according to current reports.

If all of this is true, then the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro could be strong rivals to the iPhone 13. And for Android enthusiasts, it looks like the more expensive Pixel 6 Pro will be the one to get.

Pixel wallet can now take on Apple, sort of

Google has always struggled to define where its Pixel line should be in the market. At one point, the Pixels received lower flagship prices to help reduce competition. But over time, the Pixel’s price skyrocketed, overtaking phones like the iPhone 11. The original Pixel launched at a price of $ 649 while the Pixel 4 landed at a price of $ 799.

If the Pixel 6 prices above are right, then the Pixel lineup perfectly hits all segments of the market, underestimating Apple where it counts and hopefully offering powerful photo processing to boot.

With the Pixel 5a at $ 449, we hailed it as the king of affordable phones, with high-end cameras and a solid display at a great price. The Pixel 6 and its new $ 749 Tensor chip is undermining the iPhone 13, but performance can drop. And the $ 1,000-plus Pixel 6 Pro is expected to provide users with the best camera performance available on the Android market. Even then, Android and Pixel still have a long way to go to catch up with Apple and its Bionic chipset.

For now, leaked Geekbench scores show the Pixel 6 Pro will fall short of the Android competition.

According to a report by Screen cry, the Pixel 6 Pro got a multi-core Geekbench score of 2,074. Compare that to other Android flagships like the Samsung Galaxy S21 Plus with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 processor on 3 041, Google’s new chip gets screwed.

And Tensor is nowhere near as good as Apple. If the leaked Geekbench scores are true for the Pixel 6 Pro, it will offer barely more performance than the 2017 iPhone X, which had a multi-core score of 2,053. Google barely surpassing an iPhone from four years ago isn’t at all impressive and shows how far ahead of the mobile processing game Apple is.

While the official iPhone 13 Geekbench scores are yet to be released, score leak show a score of 4,600. In our own Geekbench tests, the iPhone 13 Pro averaged a multi-core score of 4,718 – the standard iPhone 13 had a multi-core score of 4,436. The iPhone 12 Pro with its A14 Bionic chip had a multicore score of 3,860.

Either way, the Pixel 6’s supposed price should put Google’s line on a better footing compared to Apple, but the current leak scores leave a lot to be desired. Admittedly, the leaked scores aren’t necessarily indicative of the final product, so we’ll have to get our hands on to see what scores we shoot.

Even with the iPhone 13 starting at $ 799, that $ 50 premium potentially doubles performance. But if Google keeps improving Tensor, then maybe in a few years Apple and Google can be on a level playing field.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *